7 replies

  1. How can the historical, Muhammed, and the ‘Jesus’ figure of Quranic strategic fiction have a relationship except it is the further further fiction of more bogus historical fact. A rose doesn’t smell like a rose simply because it’s named ‘rose’-s sound -word- is not on an ontological continuum of some malreasoned,misappropriating sort with the entity so referred to.

    Like

    • “HISTORICAL MUHAMMAD” needs much clarity in definition.
      The figure (of populer discontent) has been “personality-revised” many times over as scapegoat for imperial agenda…

      Their “spiritual-brotherhood” is unique hecause…although from different background…BOTH revered SAME religious convictions even in between place and time…
      MORE-OVER…
      BOTH followed SAME religious convictions prophesized by many before about:-
      SAME GOD/DEITY…
      SAME LAW/BOOK…
      SAME FAITH/RELIGION.

      As for “NATIONALITY”
      Both Abraham and Moses (bp.b.u.them) had different “nationalities” too…!

      Last…but not least.
      The Rejected Christian texts called “OLD TESTAMENT” has much to say about the “GOD/LAW/FAITH of the character of the BOTH the Prophets.

      “NEW TESTAMEMT” serves to DEITIFY a CREATION of the God BOTH WORSHIPPED!

      REAL-TIME HISTORY should confirm my claim…

      Hope this alleviate your understanding….

      You welcome !😔

      REAL

      Like

  2. So the Quran is fiction but the zombies are real, right?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: