Hatun was physically assaulted at Speakers’ Corner today. Here is the footage. I explain why I have no sympathy for this woman.


Obviously I condemn the attack on Hatun the fanatical Christian missionary. But Hatun was not an innocent victim. She was being deliberately provocative. She had an insulting cartoon of Muhammad and kept on putting it up next to her face and smiling. She wanted it to be seen by Muslims (who else?). It was provocative and insulting. It was incitement, pure and simple and any normal person would say she is asking for it. She is deliberately provoking a response. This is not a ‘free speech’ issue it is something else. It is an attempt to engineer and manipulate the emotions of some volatile Muslims to strike back verbally or physically. That is what she is strategizing to achieve. Now one can put it down to evil on her part or mental illness. I don’t know. Either mentally unstable or malicious. You choose. But this is not normal behaviour. She is a troublemaker who is trying to provoke a violent response and she is achieving it.

Hatun is therefore involved in her own attack. She is not an innocent victim. She is a victim, but not an innocent one. She has brought this on herself: consciously, with forethought and foresight about what will happen. Her desired goal is obvious: martyrdom. So I have no sympathy for her. And I earnestly hope her wish is frustrated.



Categories: Anti-Islam, Evil, Speakers' Corner

72 replies

  1. 100% true, clearly she wanted this happened, she was a provocator, she had a plan, she had an agenda what to bring to speaker corner. This was what she wanted, she got it.

    I don’t agree with the attacker but noway he got a plan to attack Hatun on his head when he left home to speaker corner, that was a spontaneous reaction.

    I don’t understand with Christian teaching, they wanted to spread love but what Hatun showed us was spreading hates. Is The Holy Spirit inside her? If yes then it was The Demon Spirit.
    Love your enemy is just BS!

    That was not freedom of speech but freedom of hates.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Goddamn it, that Hatun Trash again she strikes….. It seem like I am forced to call her on Skype and destroy her and I will show her that I’m greater than her afterwards, I will destroy her.

      Don’t joke with USA!

      Like

    • provocateur of freedom of speech and exposer of the fake prophet Mohammad who foisted the biggest hoax on mankind and called it Islam. Clearly the source of this religion is Satan… what is good about this copy and corrupt paste faith that gives birth to IslamoFascists?

      Like

      • Even satan worshiping One God Alone not a human

        Like

      • The biggest hoax on mankind is “God died by human” and it called Christian. Clearly the source of this religion is Pagan.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sam, who is building sky scrapers in Mecca the most holiest of cities? You cannot convince me they are anything but idols. Where do you think the Quran came from? It came from the Bible probably the Old Testament as it is the most deplorable; the Torah and from the pagans. It is all self evident if you look.

        Like

      • What is good about this copy of copy.. of copy..of copy..of copy…of copy..of copy..of copy..of copy and corrupt paste faith that gives birth to Christian Pagan who worshiping a 100% human?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Gees Sam you worship Muhammad more than you worship, Allah. So give me a break.

        Like

      • Gee Egor, I already give you a break.

        Did you worship Jesus?

        Like

      • Sam, I do not think Jesus was getting his kicks on route 66 like Muhammad was. I do not think Jesus could have anybody’s wife if he fancied her like Muhammad could. Nor do I think Jesus was shagging his sex slaves like Muhammad. That is right, Jesus did not have sex slaves or any slaves for that matter. Muhammad was obviously a man of the people.

        Like

      • Gees Egor, do you believe God died by human?

        Like

      • Sam, did Muhammad, at the time of his death, believe that Allah had cut his aorta?

        Like

      • @Egor

        Ha..ha..ha..are those the answers for my questions?

        I told you, you don’t even dare to answer my questions!

        Like

  2. She finally got what she wanted. She always wanted to be slapped out at hyde park now she has her badge of honour. Pity a little slap send her into a fake coma where she needs her whole body looked over and becomes unconcious. I dont know how she would of dealt with the daily beating, torture, rape of Bosnian women by christians 20 years ago if a simple slap shes been wanting for so long puts her into a come. ” let me check your blood pressure ” really is she 90 yrs old?

    Like

    • What planet are you from? It wasn’t a little slap. It was a sucker punch, hard and bone crushing. Hope you get a taste of that one day so you can have pity on yourself, and “pretend” to go into a coma.

      “Christians” who rape are by default not followers of Christ Jesus and shouldn’t call themselves Christians. Christ did not teach that. You must be mistaking it with Mohammad and Islam.

      Like

  3. What are you people talking about? Hatun has every right, at Speakers Corner, to say what she wants. You do not have to listen to her. You can simply walk away. From what I saw she was having a civil discussion with somebody when these heckling hooded heroes decided to inject their five cents worth in to the conversation. That was when she pulled the cartoon and the holey Quran out. So it gets back to whom was antagonising first of all. From my observation it was the hooded heckling heroes. When she countered them, one of them lashed out. I mean nobody can counter a hooded heckling hero with out expecting a slap in the head. I mean what a ballsy effort. He strikes a foot woman who would be lucky to be forty kilos wringing wet. A true hero. You people should be ashamed of yourselves. Maybe the French are waking up to your antics finally.. Maybe it is time for the British to do so. Wonderful Selma, you sound like what you are. .

    Like

  4. Defenders of Hatun are being very naive. This is *not* about free speech. Hatun is an extremist missionary who clearly wants to be martyred for her cause. She is cynically using useful idiots (liberals, secularists) for a very illiberal fundamentalist cause.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Well what are you, Paul? You are a person who has gone from being an East Anglian Methodist to being a Muhammadan revert and you are telling people she “wants to be martyred for the cause”. What do you want my friend? You’re so mixed up, I am amazed you can put two words together. So now you are a slingshot for the Muslim narrative. A narrative we know which has “Holes in It”.You have made your bed, so now you have to lie in it. .

      Like

  5. She is out of line, but its not okay to punch her. This is not good for us, if you can’t take it walk it off, you are not doing any favours To yourself Come on, I hear one guy calling for a police in the video.And this brother looks black, hopefully they didn’t press any charges. This is not good for us.

    Like

    • The attacker denied he was a Muslim said he is a Christian.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks, good to hear he is all right.

        Like

      • Paul Williams the Great Deflector. So the hooded, bearded ruffian denied he was a Muslim and saoid he was a Christian. You have to be kidding me. Surah 3.54. There are are nine different forms of deceit in Islam and I am sure this fits in there somewhere. All the attacks around the world are being carried out by Christians. Jesus said do not lift a hand in my name. While Muhammad the messenger of “the best of deceivers” said the hand, the mouth and the heart. Paul, I guess you are the mouth while our hooded friend was the hand. You people are so unbelievably stupid..

        Like

  6. Hatun is not an islamophobe, she’s a racist bigot. She serves no purpose in life other than to antagonize muslim members of our society in the most distasteful way

    Liked by 2 people

    • I despise her, I don’t understand why some Muslims entertain her. It’s not good for either party, we will be keep burning bridges.

      Liked by 1 person

      • You despise her because she is shattering the myth which is the narrative of Islam. Muhammad exists only if Mecca existed. We know Mecca did not exist until post 841 CE. That is 109 years after Muhammad’s alleged death. We are told Muhammad ‘s mother was Amina. We are told he married Zaynab. We are told he married Aisha. That is rather humorous as the father of Abd al Malik’s father, Caliph Marwan also had a mother Amina, a wife Zaynab and another wife Aisha. Does this look like a coincidence to you? The whole Mecca, Muhammad story is concocted in the 8th 9th and 10th century. Muslim scholars know this today. The Saudis especially know this but Islam and the Sharia is the way in which they control the people.

        Like

      • “We know Mecca did not exist until post 841 CE.”

        Actually, Mecca is mentioned in the Quran, which obviously dates from the lifetime of the prophet who we know died in AD632.

        https://www.islamawakened.com/quran/48/24/

        Like

      • No Paul, you still have a long way to go Mecca is not mentioned in the Quran. Bekkah is mentioned. in the Quran. Some argue that it simply means weeping valley.Now Mecca would not be referred to as a valley of any kind. Maybe a wadi would be acceptable. While Petra, with its earthquakes, could be most certainly referred to as a weeping valley. Forgetting about the first four caliphs as they never existed you have to go to the mid 8th century to the writing of the Hafs Quran. People are saying now that Mecca was found to the south of Ur close to the ancient city of Hira. This is no where near where Mecca is today. Also, the Iraqis were known as the Keresh at that time. Sound familiar – Quraysh.

        Like

      • Egor, I am (not) sorry to break it to you, but Makkah is mentioned in Qur’ān by the name ( Makkah).

        It is also mentioned as Bakkah.

        Both names are found in Qur’ān.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks Abdullah You are correct BUT doesn’t it seem strange that you have both Bakkar and Makkar,.and only once or twice. I would think a little hanky panky went on here. We know scribes manipulated the text and they needed Mecca mentioned as it was the sanctuary We both know that to change the B to an M and all you have to do is add a loop at the bottom. Very easily done. Check out both letters my friend.

        Like

      • You are quite right Abdullah.

        Like

  7. The word Hatun or Khatun (“K” is silent in Turkish pronunciation) is as an honorific for a woman mainly since the Ottoman period (similar to the English word “Lady”). Like most Turkish honorifics, it is used after the first name.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatun
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khatun

    Wonder why people are calling her (just) Hatun.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. The question is why didn’t she turn the other cheek? 🙂

    Like

  9. WATCH THIS:

    Liked by 1 person

  10. I admire her immensely. She has the courage to stand up and critique Islam in the face of Muslims who become violent whenever their religion is critiqued. Islam should be critiqued. With so many Muslims moving to Western countries, Islam needed to be critiqued in the universities so that Western people can have an understanding of the new religion in their midst. That is how we do things in The West. New ideas and old ones are analysed and critiqued to get a better understanding of both the idea and our position in relation to it. No topic is considered so sacred that it above criticism. Islam may hold such a position in Muslim countries but not here in the West.
    The notion that her attacker is a Christian is laughable. He may well have said this to the police in order to deflect public anger from other Muslims, but any man who is prepared to knock out a woman who says things he disagrees with is also likely to be a liar as well as a coward.

    Like

    • Courage according to Aristotle: Aristotle recognized courage as the virtue at the mean between rashness and cowardice. … Courage is a virtue when we choose to do good, especially when that is most difficult. Courage most demands our respect when it incurs risk without selfish motivation. Courage is moral strength in the face of danger.

      But according to David Shapcott, some random idiot on the internet, Hatun is courageous because she is a Islamophobic a$$hole.

      Like

      • Kmak, you were doing well there but then you appeared to get far too emotional and lost it. You come to the West then expect to face critique and criticism. In the West we do not want to kill people for simply putting forward a view we might not like. You can hate and vilify who ever you want under your banner of Islam. Gees mate you do it every Friday morning at the mosque. but as soon as somebody does it to you, you either want to kill them or simply run to mummy. You want freedom of speech but only under your terms. It is not going to happen. You don’t like how we live our lives then leave.

        Like

      • Egor: In the West we do not…

        Who’s the ‘we’? White supremacists?

        Like

      • Egor: In the West we do not want to kill people…

        But in the rest of the world we do kill people.

        Liked by 1 person

    • “No topic is considered so sacred that it above criticism”
      This is indeed a real problem in the world of post-modernism. There’s absence of meaning and sacracy. You see, I can discuss with an atheist Arab that mocking the prophet pubh is wrong by telling him ” imagine that I am mocking your dad”, I think he’d have a sense that this act is wrong. But how can I do that with a person who doesn’t see any meaing and sacrcy about his parents?
      Also, the problem is the with the authorization and references. While in Islām there’s a heavenly reference, there’s no such a thing in the west of post modernism.
      When Maccron said “Islām is experiencing a crisis with all the world” = Islām is the only thing that retains the meaning for this life, so no wonder that there’s a crisis between a world with no meaning and a world full of meaning.

      Like

      • I do not speak French, but I have watched this clip for Michel Onfray with Arabic subtitle. I am posting it in case you speak French.

        Like

      • Please watch this clip in case you speak French.

        Like

      • Abdullah I appreciate your reply but you lose it at the end. To argue that life has no meaning in the West, where as Islam does, is like saying some people like meat and others do not. The problem with Islam is that it is based on fear and not love. Fear of the Hell Fire which it shoves down the minds of the young Muslims from their birth. In some cultures this might be seen as child abuse. I, in my life has no meaning position, see it as child abuse. I was watching a young Muslim the other day. He was telling his story and I felt so sad for him. He was a Pakistani and a devout Muslim. A really devout Muslim. He was telling his audience how his fear of going to Hell and have Shaytan pour molten lead over his head scared him right through his childhood. So he tried so hard to earn Allah’s blessing. He went and learnt Arabic and starting reading the Quran. I might ask what was he reading before or was he told about his life having meaning. What he found were things in the Quran which did not make sense. People at university began to ask him questions about Islam. So he did his research so he could better answer them. It was on that pathway that he lost Your meaning of life. He started seeing what it was really all about. He was no longer a sheep being forced fed. The so called Islamic way of life was a lie. That Muslims had been lied to for centuries. He decided to leave Islam. Now that is real courage and I applaud him for it. That he had the guts to pack his bag and leave. I am sure after what he saw in yesterday in the Catholic Church in France, he will be glad he did and that his sense of values has a more humanist approach than that depicted by that gutless coward from Tunisia. I wonder if those women praying in that Church were in the least provocative. If Islam is the reall reason for life then the world is not a place I want to be in the future,

        Like

  11. I have a hunch that if Hatun were white woman, the reaction to that incident by christians and others would be very different.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Nobody likes to be in the company of a person with a mental health disorder who is also a religious extremist. Everyone with a camera should just ignore her and stop exploiting her sickness

    Liked by 1 person

    • It is not the fault of Hatun that the preservation narrative in Islam is full of holes. Likewise, it is not your fault that you have been lied to as have your parents and their parents over the centuries. You are a victim of Islam as much as all of us are. In the old days the West was not concerned about Islam. Therefore the scrutiny applied by academics in the West now is a great deal greater than then. In fact, many academics know more about Islam and its history than Muslims on the whole do. So I can come up with stuff that the average Muslim has no idea about what I am talking about. Your scholars are more aware that western academics can see through the preservation story/. The Saudis know it is rubbish because they know Mecca was not the original sanctity city. It was Petra. The first time Muhammad’s name comes up in rock inscriptions is not until 698 CE. That is 66 years after his alleged death. The first time Mecca appears on a Map is 741 CE. That is 109 years after Muhammad’s alleged death. All the hadiths, you know the narratives like those found in Sahih Al-Bukari and Muslim were not put to paper until 240 years after Muhammad’s death. What does this tell you? Well the first thing i see as an historian, is that all hadiths would have to be considered weak and that includes all those in the Sunnah. Sickness,,given what I have provided you with, is a state of mind. Maybe it is Islam which is fraught with sickness

      Like

      • Everything you said is so bland and reeks of unreliable sources. Congratulations for claiming your a historian and feeling good in that moment, but that moment has passed and reality is your not a honest man.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Egor: So I can come up with stuff that the average Muslim has no idea about what I am talking about.

        Oh great, another random idiot on the internet who thinks he’s got it all figured out!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Kmak Gees next year I may have a different point of view to what I have now – based on the available evidence that is being presented . I would be very surprised if you could say the same. As far as King vs Gibson. we both know that King has come out and attacked Gibson’s findings. What else can he do. If he doesn’t he loses all credibility. The key fact here, is Islam goes with King. Why because he denoucnes the Petra theory. How many 7th Century mosques did King go to? I think it was either one or nil. Now Gibson went a wide range of 7th Century mosques and guess what, all qiblas pointed to Petra. He even went as far as to a mosque in China. King, in the greater part of his research worked off documentation probably produced in various centuries but chiefly from those we see the narrative coming from to wit the 8th, 9th and 10th centuries. You will notice that they refer to the fact that King has a PHD and Gibson doesn’t therefore on that basis alone, King is more reliable. Rubbish. But I can see why Islam lean towards King. They are on such shaky ground now they will lean towards anybody who supports the fairy tale.

        Kmak you can say what you want about the existence of Mecca but we know and the Saudi’s know it is tripe. Why would they be knocking down Khadija’s alleged home. The home that Muhammad allegedly lived in? Khadija – the first mother – and Muhammad – the alleged last prophet. Why won’t the Saudis allow archaeologists dig around Mecca? Yet the Saudi’s let the chinese do a dig at the site of one of the drop off points (al-Serrian) for mecca for people on the hajj. So the Saudis are happy to destroy historical artefacts and homes to build sky scrapers. Yeh right. I said the first time Muhammad appears on a rock inscription was 698 CE. Answer this little quiz, Kmak should be easy for a man of your jurisprudence. Who had a mother named Amina? Who had a wife called Zaynab? Who had a wife called Aisha? Any hints my friend? I look forward to your answer. I am sorry but the narrative has holes in it as Yasir Qadhi said. It is as shaky as a tin cup in an earthquake. No Mecca then no Muhammad. Well not as he has been sold to you. .

        Like

      • Notice the replys to this question offer no arguments as usual. They either know what you’re saying is true or are too ignorant to care. Says it all doesnt it?

        Like

      • Truth: Notice the replys to this question offer no arguments as usual.

        That’s because there’s nothing original about Egor’s claims. For example, Egor claims Muslims originally faced Petra in their prayers. The source of this claim is a non-scholar called Dan Gibson. Gibson’s claim has been thoroughly debunked by David King.

        Egor claims there are no references to Muhammad prior to 698 CE. This is false. Sean Anthony, Professor of Islamic Studies at Ohio University, shows in his book, Muhammad and the Empires of Faith, that Muhammad is mentioned by name in non-Muslim sources as early 637 CE.

        Egor claims that all hadith are weak because they were put to paper later. Yet, this is not the position of contemporary academic hadith scholars like Gregor Schoeler and Andreas Goerke who have used the isnad-cum-matn analogy to establish the reliability of numerous hadith.

        In short, both you and Egor are full of $hit.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Egor: Kmak Gees next year I may have a different point of view to what I have now – based on the available evidence that is being presented

        You don’t seem to get it. You are some random idiot on the internet. It simply doesn’t matter what your opinions on the origins of Islam are. As pointed out by Jonathan Brockopp in his 2016 article, the vast majority of Islamic studies scholars in Western academia accept (1) the Quran was compiled early (according to Nicolai Sinai, the Rasm of the Quran was fixed as early as 650 CE) and (2) Muhammad existed.

        Like

      • Prove to me Muhammad existed without using the narrative and do my quiz. As far as the Quran goes, You have the hafs with its vowels and diacritical marks which was written about the mid 8th Century. I want to see a copy of the original Uthman codex. You are the know all so please where can I find one. Hatun and David wood were not the first to destroy qurans, Uthman was if you believe the mythology. Remember what Bilal Phillips said they will leave in avalanches and tsunamis.

        Like

      • Egor: Prove to me Muhammad existed without using the narrative and do my quiz.

        Again, you’re some random idiot on the internet. I don’t have to prove anything to you. When the vast majority of scholars don’t deny the existence of Muhammad(saw) but some random internet troll does, the rational thing to do is to go with the scholars.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Why not go with the scholars. They have been lying to you for centuries so why not stay in the river of lies. So your argument for the existence of Muhammad is the narrative. Well that is a convincing argument. No wonder Islam does not want people critiquing it because the babbling sheep will simply believe what they are told but they might see something which lights their light.. People are leaving in droves yet people like you want to rely on a narrative which a number of your own scholars are saying is nonsense.

        Like

      • @Egor

        Why do you want Muslim to prove this, prove that?

        Do you believe Allah SWT exist?
        Do you believe Jesus exist?
        Do you believe God exist?

        Like

      • Gee Sam, I thought Allah was God. If you asked me to justify the existence of Santa Claus, I think I would have a difficult time doing that. Islam claims it is the perfect religion. When a theocracy makes that sort of claim then it is open to critique. That is what people in the West tend to do. In the East they just believe what they are told just like kids being told about Santa Claus. The major difference between the two, is that Santa Claus is a fantasy which brings pleasure to young kids. Islam is a fantasy which wants the total subjugation of the world under Islam. Is it just me or is there a difference there, Sam?

        Like

      • Egor: Why not go with the scholars. They have been lying to you for centuries so why not stay in the river of lies.

        Scholars are liars, says the random Islamophobe on the internet.

        Like

      • Kmak What a stupid word. Islamophobe. I believe I was one of the first to pull it apart and denounce it io You Tube about eight years ago. Now everybody does. I do not have an irrational fear of Islam. The fear is real and Islam is a threat to the rest of the world. The Left, poor little snowflakes that they are, believe in labelling everybody who does not agree with them Islam is now doing he same. Where people cannot debate they label, just like you are doing. You even sound a little fragile at times. The Left think they have a friend in Islam and Islam wants them to protect it while they are in the minority. The Left, in their ignorance, have not realised that they are still non Muslims and will eventually be treated the same as everybody else. Why wouldn’t scholars lie to you, Kmak? If they came out and told you what they really believe, they would be hardly considered scholars anymore. Watch and learn, Kmak. These are Muslims talking.

        You won’t watch it because your faith is not strong enough already. You are an educated man and you are not stupid.

        Like

      • Egor: Kmak What a stupid word. Islamophobe. I believe I was one of the first to pull it apart and denounce it io You Tube about eight years ago. Now everybody does.

        You are one clueless idiot.

        ‘In recent years, Islamophobia has evolved from a primarily political concept toward one increasingly deployed for analytical purposes. Researchers have begun using the term to identify the history, presence, dimensions, intensity, causes, and consequences of anti-Islamic and anti-Muslim sentiments. In short, Islamophobia is an emerging comparative concept in the social sciences’ (Erik Bleich, ,2016, Defining and Researching Islamophobes).

        Egor: . I do not have an irrational fear of Islam. The fear is real and Islam is a threat to the rest of the world.

        Spoken like a true Islamophobe.

        Egor: Why wouldn’t scholars lie to you, Kmak? If they came out and told you what they really believe, they would be hardly considered scholars anymore. Watch and learn, Kmak. These are Muslims talking…You won’t watch it because your faith is not strong enough already. You are an educated man and you are not stupid.

        You are right that I have 0 interesting in watching David Wood videos, but that has nothing to do with the strength of my faith. It has to do with the fact that (1) I rely on peer reviewed journal articles and other ACADEMIC publications for knowledge, and (2) David Wood is a psychopath and an Islamophobe who gets paid specifically to produce garbage content. When I open, for instance, the latest issue of the Journal of Quranic studies, I see articles such as ‘Conflict and Conciliation in the Meccan and Median Quran’ and ‘Towards and Abrahamic Religion: Developments in Later Meccan Surahs’. In contrast, some of Wood’s recent videos are ‘Why Muslims should be happy about Muhammad cartoons?’ and ‘Will the real Allah please stand up?’.

        You are also right that I am an educated man. I am a social scientist by training (I have a PHD). Take it from a scholar, you and Wood are full of $hit.

        Like

      • Kmam I am intrigued that a social scientist like yourself would get so angry and abusive over somebody putting forward a theory which perhaps counters yours. David Wood, may as you claim, be a psychopath but he also has a PHD. I wonder what that makes you? Truth be known, PHDs are a dime a dozen now days but I do applaud you on your academic achievement. In the Islamic world that makes you a bit of a giant. In the academic world producing papers in number is more important than producing papers in quality. One only has to look at “climate change” to see the trash that is coming out in “academic papers and journals”. So called experts predicting where we shall be in fifty years time

        In Australia there is this bloke Tim Flannery. He has degrees coming out of his arm pits. He has awards stacked to the roof. and in 2012 when Australia had its last La Nina, he announced Australia would not see the Warragamba Dam in Sydney ever full again. Good one, Tim. Then when I was looking at the weather in Australia, it was obvious they were going to have another La Nina this year. Currently the dam is sitting at 97%. I think Tim was off the mark on that one and he was or is an expert. What he has is an ego and what he lacks is common sense.

        Now while you think David Wood is below you for what ever reason. I would bet an onion to a snowflake he knows a great deal more about your religion than you do. I am sorry to tell you the papers you are reading are being produced by the Tim Flannery types’ of Islam In other words they will be playing on the Islamic court and no where else. While others like Jay Smith (I think he has a PHD as well), Dan Brubaker (I think he has a PHD as well), Dan Gibson, Mel and others are doing some exciting work on shattering the myth which is Islam.That my friend is your worst nightmare. In fact, it is every Islamic zealots worst nightmare. What are you going to do when the story becomes unstuck as appears to be happening?

        You will notice I have been polite to you and your PHD in the Social Sciences. If I may be so bold what was the focus of your thesis?

        Kind regards

        Like

      • @Egor

        You don’t even dare answer my questions..LOL.

        Like

    • ur, dur.. am not condoning what appened but er der it rightfully appened according to the title of my video. biatches best know der place innit. me man, me take no disrespec from der um woman innit. biatches best do what we say ight. Dis woman is der trash she no do as commanded by man

      Like

  13. “It was provocative and insulting. It was incitement, pure and simple and any normal person would say she is asking for it.” – No. A normal person would say that this kind of animalistic behaviour doesn’t belong here because it is a free democratic country, and speakers corner is where indigenous British people have been able to express their thoughts, unmolested, for centuries! It is not a totalitarian shariah hellhole. No normal person would excuse assaulting a frail woman for such a pathetic reason. But we all know just what Islam thinks of women

    “Now one can put it down to evil on her part or mental illness. I don’t know. Either mentally unstable or malicious. You choose. But this is not normal behaviour.” – Replace the word “her” with “muslims” and I fully agree 100%

    Like

    • I guess those three people in Notre Dame were asking for it as well, Truth. They were highly provocative while on their knees praying. No doubt you have come out and condemned the his behaviour. The same goes for all you so called Muslims on this blog. Where is your condemnation. You are hypocrites.

      Like

      • Your a bigger idiot than I thought if you can’t understand this is the outcome the French government wanted. You don’t understand politics and you sure don’t understand islam if you think killing innocent people for any reason is justifiable.

        Like

      • So Hatun was provocative and that is why she got hit in the head by a man in a hood. But she actually knew the man in the hood as he was a Christian. So she said belt me in the head and I shall be martyred and everyone will feel sorry for me. Is that what some of you Muslims are suggesting? Now you are saying those three innocent people slaughtered by an Islamic coward is what France wanted. Do you really understand what you are saying? It appears to me everything that happens in the world is not the fault of Islam and you are the true victims. Muhammad would be rolling over in his grave at your cowardice. Also, I understand Islam and its goals better than you. You are a sheep and will continue to be so because you do not have the intelligence to question things which do not fit together historically. Baa Baa.

        Like

  14. Brother Paul, for that accurate summary you wrote below the heading, it should be a plaque or signpost or something at the entrance of SC. I cannot (otherwise) describe how precise it is.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: