The Bible story of ‘The Walls of Jericho’ is just a legend: science proves it never happened.

1_Cr2TWK6KkZJjuGRnwK6uKg

There is no story in the Conquest narrative more impressive than the battle of the invading Israelites against the mighty fortified city of Jericho, with its large population and massive protecting walls (see Joshua chapter 6). Unfortunately, archaeologists who have excavated the site of Jericho have discovered that the description of the great battle cannot be brought into harmony with the realities of history.

In the story, the city of Jericho is so massive and powerful that the 40,000 Israelite warriors cannot simply attack it head-on. God gives them a miraculous victory by devising a plan to cause the walls to fall, ruining the powerful fortifications and giving the invaders direct access to the large city and its many inhabitants.

Modern excavations have shown that the story is almost certainly a legend without historical basis. The first truly scientific archaeological examination of the site was undertaken by Kathleen Kenyon in the 1950s, and her findings have been corroborated since.  Archaeologists now know that there was indeed an inhabited site at ancient Jericho from prehistoric times (going back to the Neolithic period). The site was inhabited on and off periodically throughout history – until today.  But there was no walled city there – let alone a very large and heavily fortified city – at the end of the thirteenth century, when the Battle of Jericho allegedly took place. At the time, Jericho was a sparsely populated little place, and there were no walls around the city at all.

Judging from the archaeological record, the biblical stories of Rahab the prostitute, the spies who scouted out the land, the attack of the Israelites, the miraculous fall of the walls, the slaughter of all the inhabitants – all of it appears to be the stuff of legend and not an account of real history as it actually happened.

——————

The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction by renowned biblical scholar and New York Times bestselling author Dr Bart D. Ehrman, p. 97.



Categories: Bible, Dr Jonathan Brown, History

5 replies

  1. Liberal archaeologist!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Science is indeed very important.

    Maurice Bucaille was a physician and an eminent scientist in France.

    He was so accomplished and respected that he was admitted to the French Academy of Sciences.

    This is what he wrote at the end of his book

    entitled The Bible, the Qur’an, and Science

    “In view of the level of knowledge in Muhammad’s day, it is inconceivable that many of the statements in the Qur’an which are connected with science could have been the work of man. It is, moreover, perfectly legitimate, not only to regard the Qur’an as the expression of a Revelation, but also to award it a very special place, on account of the guarantee of authenticity it provides and the presence in it of scientific statement which, when studied today, appear as a challenge to explanation in human terms.”

    Like

  3. Dr. Maurice Bucaille also did an analysis of verses in the Bible dealing with science.

    “The comparison of several Biblical and Qur’anic narrations of the same subject shows the existence of fundamental differences between statements in the former, which are scientifically unacceptable, and declarations in the latter which are in perfect agreement with modern data: this was the case of the Creation and Flood, for example.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: