The Christian idea of the Incarnation of God in Jesus is “foreign” to the gospel of Luke and Matthew

Luke 1:30-35 (NRSV)
30 The angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. 31 And now, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will name him Jesus. 32 He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David. 33 He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” 34 Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” 35 The angel said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be holy; he will be called Son of God.

Four distinguished historians and New Testament scholars explain why the Christian story of the Incarnation of God in Jesus is “foreign” to the gospel of Luke and Matthew:

10295378_10154105771610467_4412210460811368139_o10387097_10154194162370467_935395942141351881_o13346579_10156801071965467_3288204539905626677_nbrownquote3

And so we can justly conclude: 

screen-shot-2018-11-22-at-00-32-33



Categories: Bible, Christianity, Christology, God, Gospels, Jesus, Mary, mother of Jesus, New Testament scholarship, Scholars

1 reply

  1. Reblogged this on The Quran and Bible Blog and commented:

    According to eminent scholars, the gospels, with the exception of John, do not teach that Jesus was “God-incarnate”. No surprise there.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to quranandbibleblog Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: