Patriotic Alternative – Britain’s new Nazi movement – now at Speakers’ Corner

Speakers’ Corner is evolving. Anjem Choudary’s gang of terrorist scumbags are nearly all gone – either banned or rotting in prison. Only Sulayman remains.

Just a few weeks ago Patriotic Alternative – Britain’s new Nazi movement – appeared at Speakers’ Corner headed up by a brown man, Ralph (yes really!):

Screenshot 2020-01-15 at 21.19.48

Ralph Masilamani at Speakers’ Corner calling for the repatriation of non-white people

He wants to deport Muslims, blacks, Sikhs, in fact anyone who is not white. Yet he is of Indian origin himself!

The national leader (or Führer) of Patriotic Alternative is Mark Collett from Leeds.  His political philosophy is openly National Socialist. He is the author of The Fall of Western Man which praises Nazi Germany and its policies. He believes there is a vast international conspiracy of Jews who want to destroy the white race. He casts doubt on the Holocaust.

EE6lOY_XUAYXuwW

Ralph gets very defensive when I remind him of the Nazi ideology of his Leader. He claims it is irrelevant and that the movement is not really Nazi. Either Ralph is being disingenuous or willfully blind.

Either way Patriotic Alternative is not in the least patriotic. Millions of British people fought against National Socialism and Adolf Hitler. There is no way on earth patriots are going to follow Hitler again!  

I and others will continue to expose these Nazis at Speakers’ Corner, and on line.

The battle begins..

IMG_2664

Ralph wearing a MAGA hat and giving a Nazi salute.

 

 



Categories: Extremism, Far right, Islamophobia, Nazi, Patriotic Alternative

35 replies

  1. ‘He wants to deport Muslims, blacks, Sikhs, in fact anyone who is not white. Yet he is of Indian origin himself!’

    Lol. What a cuck.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Ralph has lifted all his videos from Youtube.

    But we have copies!

    Like

  3. “We come to it at last. The great battle of our time.”

    Minas Morgol (The Dead City) = The City of London.
    Army = Globalist Multiculturalists
    Mordor = Venetian Oligarchy
    The King = ᛚᛖᛏ ᚺᛁᛗ, ᚹᚺᛟ ᛁᛋ ᚹᛟᚱᛏᚺᚤ, ᚹᛁᛖᛚᛞ ᛏᚺᛖ ᛋᚹᛟᚱᛞ ᛟᚠ ᛏᚺᛖ ᛖᚢᚱᛟᛈᛖᚨᚾ ᚱᚨᚲᛁᚨᛚ ᛈᚨᚱᛏᛁᛏᛁᛟᚾ ᚨᚾᛞ ᛞᛖᚠᛁᚾᛖ ᛏᚺᛖ ᚹᚺᛁᛏᛖᚺᛟᛗᛖᛚᚨᚾᛞ ᛏᛟ ᛋᛏᛟᛈ ᚹᚺᛁᛏᛖ ᚷᛖᚾᛟᚲᛁᛞᛖ. ᚹᚺᚨᛏ ᛋᚨᚤ ᚤᛟᚢ?
    ᚲᛟᚾᛃᚢᚱᛖ ᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᛗᛗᛟᚾ ᛏᚺᛖ ᚨᚱᛗᚤ ᛟᚠ ᛏᚺᛖ ᛞᛖᚨᛞ.
    Secret Stairs = Speakers’ Corner.
    Gondor = White Homelands
    Minas Tirith = Nationalism

    ANGLO-SAXONS ARE STUPID PEOPLE say THE GLOBALISTS:
    “The old Venetians never wanted to conquer territory for
    their empire, except when indispensable to maintain
    trade monopolies. Territory didn’t interest the Venetians.
    The idea of expanding borders is a stupid Anglo-Saxon
    concept picked up by the Russians. Venice propagated
    it’s system through its bureaucracy in the nationalities it
    conquered.”
    Venetian Patrician Count Foscari.

    Like

    • @ IPF

      So couple questions as I have never spoken to someone with super nationalist views:

      1. Don’t you feel as if you’re view is a thing of the dinosaurs and are fighting the inevitable?

      The world is more connected than ever and will only grow more and more barring some sort of cataclysmic event that resets us to the Dark Ages like a nuclear war.

      2. The concept of the nationalism and the nation-state are semi-modern and arbitrary:

      There is no rhyme or reason to the nation-state and nationalism. It is literally just an imaginary line drawn one day on the map, that doesn’t mean the people in this imaginary line should be united. For example, African-Americans or Native Americans in the United States have no logical reason to like or be loyal to their imaginary boundary.

      3. Immigration to “White Homelands”:

      Isn’t this level of immigration due to Colonialism exploiting government and resources of multiple countries and then one day drawing up said imaginary lines? If I moved the exact same circumstances and resources to another continent wouldn’t this cause the same thing and has nothing to do with the superiority of Europe?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thank you for your questions:

        1. Don’t you feel as if you’re view is a thing of the dinosaurs and are fighting the inevitable?

        Response: No. What exactly do you think is “inevitable”? Remember that scene in The Matrix where Agent Smith says the same thing 🙂

        The world is more connected than ever and will only grow more and more barring some sort of cataclysmic event that resets us to the Dark Ages like a nuclear war.

        Response: Yes. You are correct.

        2. The concept of the nationalism and the nation-state are semi-modern and arbitrary:

        Response: Yes. You are correct.

        There is no rhyme or reason to the nation-state and nationalism. It is literally just an imaginary line drawn one day on the map, that doesn’t mean the people in this imaginary line should be united. For example, African-Americans or Native Americans in the United States have no logical reason to like or be loyal to their imaginary boundary.

        Response: Yes. You are correct.

        3. Immigration to “White Homelands”:
        Isn’t this level of immigration due to Colonialism exploiting government and resources of multiple countries and then one day drawing up said imaginary lines?

        Response: Yes. But the White Homelands were and are the settlements of White Mercenaries. National Racialism will establish a WhiteHomeland for the ex-Mercenaries to return home to their roots.

        If I moved the exact same circumstances and resources to another continent wouldn’t this cause the same thing and has nothing to do with the superiority of Europe?

        Response: I am not sure. But the superiority of Europe is a construct brought about by Mercenary activities.

        I hope that answered you questions. If not please feel free to ask more.

        Like

      • May I suggest you talk to some Jewish supremacists firstly and see if they want to be out bred in Israel. Or go and speak to the Chinese or even the Indians. I think your views will be laughed out of sight. Only a stupid weak White Cuck would even try and pass these of the shelf anti white views.

        Liked by 1 person

      • The questions which every white person in Western Europe and North America needs to answer are these: Are you looking forward to being a minority? What sort of country do you want your kids or grandkids to grow up in? What kinds of society do blacks create? What kinds of society do Muslims create? There are questions, but those are the main ones, I’d say. BTW, “you’re a Nazi” is not an answer.

        Like

      • Adrian: What kinds of society do Muslims create?

        Societies with strong family values where people don’t grow up to be trans, furries, non-binary and other nonsense that comes out of white people?

        Liked by 3 people

      • @ Adrian
        Not genocidal maniacs who murdered 3 continents worth of people?

        Liked by 2 people

      • @ Kmak
        N
        A good one. But I believe the answer is not genocidal maniacs who murdered 3 continents worth of people while trying to play the victim card?

        Liked by 2 people

      • @ Adrian the Snowflake

        Also to answer your questions as you’re obviously retarded and know nothing about world history:

        1. What kinds of society do blacks create?

        Now I know you think I’m going to go for “Egypt” (so you can do the “we wuz kangs” joke) but no let me give you some history lessons:

        1. Mansa Musa (richest person in recorded history)
        https://www.history.com/news/who-was-the-richest-man-in-history-mansa-musa

        That is 4 times Jeff Bezos net worth and 60 BILLION more than Rockefeller
        https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/royals/mansa-musa-net-worth/

        2. Mali Empire
        3. Songhay Empire
        4. Ghana Empire
        5. Abyssinia
        6. Kush
        7. Meroe

        Do I need to keep going because I can?

        2. What kinds of society do Muslims create?

        Dominating cultural powerhouses.

        1. Most dominant culture for over 1,000 years.
        2. Of the top 10 largest Empires we’re in 3 spots on the list
        https://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-10-greatest-empires-in-history-2011-9#10-the-rashidun-caliphate-continued-muhammads-legacy-1

        3. Are you looking forward to being a minority?

        Could care less. Already a religious minority.

        4. What sort of country do you want your kids or grandkids to grow up in?

        One where the world is worshipping God as He has legislated in peace. Hopefully, as a bonus one where dumb@$$e$ like you, who are arrogant despite having no control whatsoever about their skin tone don’t exist.

        Any more questions for me?

        Liked by 1 person

      • @ Stephen Squire

        Oh, my apologies I didn’t see this little number:

        “Only a stupid weak White Cuck would even try and pass these of the shelf anti white views.”

        Only an inbred hillbilly would try to pass off his already accepted to be wrong by anyone experienced in the field views as anything other than retarded. Here let me help you away before you go climb back on your sister Billie-Jean for another roll around in the hay.

        Intelligent people have this thing called the “End of History” as I know you’ve probably never heard about this at the farm, we’ll go to Wikipedia to explain:

        “The end of history is a political and philosophical concept that supposes that a particular political, economic, or social system may develop that would constitute the end-point of humanity’s sociocultural evolution and the final form of human government. A variety of authors have argued that a particular system is the “end of history” including Thomas More in Utopia, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Karl Marx,[1] Vladimir Solovyov, Alexandre Kojève,[2] and Francis Fukuyama in the 1992 book, The End of History and the Last Man.[3]

        The concept of an end of history differs from ideas of an end of the world as expressed in various religions, which may forecast a complete destruction of the Earth or of life on Earth, and the end of the human race as we know it. The end of history instead proposes a state in which human life continues indefinitely into the future without any further major changes in society, system of governance, or economics.”

        What that means, is there will be an eventual point where no major developments in sociocultural or government (basically what I said the first time with the one gentlemen, that we are getting more and more connected where they’ll start to be indistinguishable from one another.) If you need an example look no further than Russia and the United States. Originally bitter ideological rivals and while they are by no means the same they have already started to “cross-pollinate” ideas to one another. The United States started adopting more Socialism (that’s how you get your Welfare check and food stamps every month) and Russia is becoming more capitalistic along with China (with of course major corruption). As this process continues eventually culture will begin to blend as well. The concept of nationalism is both modern and stupid. Regarding your other points:

        “May I suggest you talk to some Jewish supremacists firstly and see if they want to be out bred in Israel.”

        They already are. And their plan was stupid as they would never be able to hold it. I hope you don’t base your beliefs off what other dumb@$$e$ do.

        “Or go and speak to the Chinese or even the Indians. I think your views will be laughed out of sight.”

        Two very homogenous culture historically. Already cited an example of China becoming more capitilist. The same runs true for India. Eventually, as they emerge as world powers they too will start to assimilate as they are unable to disconnect themselves from the world. They can “laugh” all day, but it is impossible in the current modern setup for this not to happen.

        Alright anymore of your stupid questions, comments or concerns?

        Liked by 1 person

      • lol those blokes would make a better case for race realism by simply keeping their mouth shut

        Liked by 1 person

  4. You’re not exposing anyone who openly exposes themselves. I watched the the whole thing at Speakers Corner.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Talk about falling on one’s own sword!

    Ralph should, if he’s consistent, deport himself back to India where he can join his fellow nationalists like the BJP.

    BTW just curious since the conservation is moving along; what’s all your opinions on the rise of nationalism in Europe/US ?

    Liked by 1 person

    • The European & American people’s warming towards Nationalism is totally down to the failed and undeliverable policies of the liberal and Centralist dogma of the last 40yrs. The people are looking for political Diversity and are deserting the legacy corrupt old parties.
      It’s called Change and nothing lasts forever.
      Individuals from 70/100 years ago no longer hold any sway in reality & are part of History.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Interesting, so you think that nationalism is here to stay? Many people would say that this also is a fleeting thing, the death pangs of the old world where divisions of culture and society will be replaced with a shared ideology of progressive liberalism.

        I have sympathy with the desire to retain cultural norms but am shown more often than not that those who most loudly represent nationalism lack any real knowledge about what said culture is and what are its characteristics.

        As stew pointed out before; many societies that now have nationalists are blind to the reality that these borders are manufactured, often without the consent of many of those whom it affected the most such as in the Arab world.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Nationalism has never gone away it went out of vouge in Europe but freed all people from Imperialism.
        Arab Nationalism freed the Arab world from the ottoman/Turks.
        Can you give one example of a country that was from its foundation Liberal created? I can’t think of one. Sweden hasn’t had a Nationalist party for 90 yrs before Swedish Democrats come along they look like the largest party now despite the European wide media bias. A good example of when theres an Election where Nationalists are doing well is to watch for the Hitler and Holocaust exploitation reminder stories directed at the Boomers.
        You can set your watch by them. As if Hitler “owns Nationalism”.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Yes plenty of nations have been established on Liberal principles such as during the American, French, and Glorious revolutions of which the principles of the abandonment of the divine right of kings and a push toward secularism, freedom of speech, and possessing inalienable rights above law all pre-existed in theory those political movements.

        Arab nationalism didn’t overthrow the Ottomans and neither has it necessarily the Arab world any favours in terms or establishing/re-establishing a sense of distinction from said Empire which had been it’s natural state long before the Ottomans, for example Syria (my country) had not been independent for 2000 years or more. How is it a good idea to destroy such a foundational infrastructure and not provide an alternative? Like stew said: borders made arbitrarily and without consideration for historic relations between states and a shared imperial identity.

        These are serious problems that nationalism has not sufficiently dealt with in the Arab world and has led to tyrannical regimes who are now destroying those nations, some of whom were propped up by the US etc.

        Where is the independence?

        Liked by 2 people

      • Name a country then if you think plenty are founded liberal, open borders etc.

        I think your find its European Nationalists that stood up for Syria, it was Nick Griffin MEP when he was visiting Damascus that wrote the letter on behalf of Syrian Gov that was sent to the UK parliament that helped lose the vote bomb Syria 2013.
        its not Nationalists that don’t believe in the Nation state its Globalists/Liberalism.
        Ethno Nationalists believe the rights all people to a homeland.

        Liked by 1 person

      • I gave you three examples already, do you not have anything to say about them?

        Regarding Nick Griffin and Syria. Please see this report from the BBC that points out your, and his, boasts are far from accepted:
        https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23942041

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Terrible that a half brown and half white man should stand up for whites in their own country. Nothing like when a half black and half white president stands up for blacks in a white country. You self-loathing anti-white whites make me laugh.

    Liked by 1 person

Trackbacks

  1. Breaking News: Speakers’ Corner neo-Nazi Ralph plays host to violent extremists on his YouTube account ‘Right Reaction’ – Blogging Theology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: