One would expect, as an antecedent probability, that if God wished to send down to mankind a Revelation, that He would announce this amazing fact clearly. The Qur’an does this in many places. The first instance is at the beginning of the second Surah, reproduced below from the Yusuf Ali translation.
It is a subjective human claim by one man, who came 600 years too late. It is a false claim, since there is no historical evidence of anyone else to confirm Muhammad’s revelations. (whereas the different writers of the NT affirm each other – Galatians chapters 1-2; book of Acts, 1 Corinthians 15; 2 Peter 3:15-18 – the eleven disciples affirmed the apostle Paul as a true apostle; Luke-Acts).
Muhammad got all his right content from previous revelations and mixed it up with his own ignorance and misunderstandings and human subjective “wisdom” and political and military ideas (harsh and brutal).
The previous Scriptures (OT and NT) are unified by their intertextuality (quotes and allusions to each other) and God-breathed quality.
2 Timothy 3:16-17; 2 Peter 1:19-21; John 17:17; Psalm 19; Psalm 119.
Blah, blah, blah. Yeah, no one buys this rubbish. Honest people know that there was a conflict between Paul, the false apostle, and the disciples of Jesus. Honest people also know that the Bible is written by anonymous potatoes (to borrow Atlas’ terminology) who had different ideas.
Ken refers to 2 Timothy 3:16-17; 2 Peter 1:19-21
– both well known forgeries!
Only “well known” as “forgeries” to the anti-supernaturalist leftists scholars that you promote. They are also the root of promoting LGBTQ and Marxism of today. You should be ashamed to promote gay theology.
HAHAHA, poor Pennywise can only deflect. Like I said, honest people see through your lies. No one takes a used car salesman seriously, Pennywise, so stop acting like one.
People with an intellect can see that these verses are forgeries. 2 Peter is so obvious, the only ones who deny it are brainwashed clowns like you.
liberal or not why not just focus on the facts Ken…