The Christology of Jesus

So who did Jesus think he was?

He thought he was a man. This might seem to be a somewhat superfluous claim to make but the significance of this statement is often overlooked in the Christian tradition. Let us go back for a moment to what most New Testament scholars now regards as reasonably certain regarding the historical Jesus and the evolution of Christology that can be detected in the pages of the New Testament.

The scholarly consensus is that the first gospel to be written was Mark. Matthew and Luke then used Mark as a source, as well as a hypothetical sayings source known as Q. I think this is the most plausible explanation, though a few scholars disagree. To take Matthew as an example: he relies on Mark as one of his sources. But he clearly thought Mark was inadequate and incomplete. Sometimes Matthew paraphrases Mark, sometimes he deliberately alters Mark to ‘improve’ his presentation of Jesus. This shows us that for Matthew, facts could be changed to enhance his message. A good example of this change is to note the negative portrayal of Jesus’ disciples in Mark: they are shown as hard of heart and timid and they repeatedly fail to understand Jesus’ message. Matthew has a very different and positive picture: perhaps wanting to show the disciples as good role models for Christians, he is happy to change the facts of history to fit his view point. Compare for example Mark 6:51-52 and Matthew 14:27-33.

Mark 6:51-52:

Then he got into the boat with them and the wind ceased. And they were utterly astounded, for they did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were hardened.

Matthew 14:27-33

But immediately Jesus spoke to them and said, ‘Take heart, it is I; do not be afraid.’

Peter answered him, ‘Lord, if it is you, command me to come to you on the water.’ He said, ‘Come.’ So Peter got out of the boat, started walking on the water, and came towards Jesus. But when he noticed the strong wind, he became frightened, and beginning to sink, he cried out, ‘Lord, save me!’ Jesus immediately reached out his hand and caught him, saying to him, ‘You of little faith, why did you doubt?’ When they got into the boat, the wind ceased. And those in the boat worshipped him, saying, ‘Truly you are the Son of God.’

Likewise it is clear that there has been a development in the way Jesus is presented in the pages of the New Testament. Let’s look at the earliest gospel to be written, that of Mark. This shows us a very human figure:

1) Jesus is a man who prays to God (1:35)

Very early in the morning, while it was still dark, Jesus got up, left the house and went off to a solitary place, where he prayed.

2) Jesus is unable to work miracles in his own town (Mark 6:1,5)

He left that place and came to his home town, and his disciples followed him….And he could do no deed of power there, except that he laid his hands on a few sick people and cured them. And he was amazed at their unbelief.

But in Matthew’s redaction of Mark in we read,

And they took offence at him. But Jesus said to them, ‘Prophets are not without honour except in their own country and in their own house.’ And he did not do many deeds of power there, because of their unbelief.

Matthew 13:57-58

In other words, he ‘could not’ is changed to he ‘did not’ – inability to act becomes a decision not to act. The incapacity is removed and Jesus‘ status is accordingly enhanced.

3) Jesus confesses his ignorance about the date of the End of the world (Mark 13:32)

‘But about that day or hour no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.’

Later Christian teaching would assert that Jesus is equal God in knowledge.

4) Jesus did not know the identity of a woman who touched him and had to ask his disciples for help (Mark 5:30),

Immediately aware that power had gone forth from him, Jesus turned about in the crowd and said, ‘Who touched my clothes?’

But see Matthew’s redaction in 9:20-22:

Then suddenly a woman who had been suffering from haemorrhages for twelve years came up behind him and touched the fringe of his cloak, for she said to herself, ‘If I only touch his cloak, I will be made well.’ Jesus turned, and seeing her he said, ‘Take heart, daughter; your faith has made you well.’ And instantly the woman was made well.

In the earlier Gospel of Mark Jesus is ignorant of who had touched him. This shortcoming is eliminated in Matthew’s improved version where Jesus immediately identifies the woman.

5) Jesus was so irritated by the absence of figs he cursed a fig tree even though it was not the season for figs see Mark 11:13-14,

On the following day, when they came from Bethany, he was hungry. Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to see whether perhaps he would find anything on it. When he came to it, he found nothing but leaves, for it was not the season for figs. He said to it, ‘May no one ever eat fruit from you again.’ And his disciples heard it.

But see Matthew’s redaction of Mark in 21:18-22,

In the morning, when he returned to the city, he was hungry. And seeing a fig tree by the side of the road, he went to it and found nothing at all on it but leaves. Then he said to it, ‘May no fruit ever come from you again!’ And the fig tree withered at once. When the disciples saw it, they were amazed, saying, ‘How did the fig tree wither at once? ‘Jesus answered them, ‘Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only will you do what has been done to the fig tree, but even if you say to this mountain, “Be lifted up and thrown into the sea”, it will be done. Whatever you ask for in prayer with faith, you will receive.’

Matthew transforms Jesus’ ‘mistake’ into an edifying spiritual lesson for the disciples!

6) Jesus even denies that he is perfectly good in the earliest Gospel of Mark chapter 10,

As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up and knelt before him, and asked him, ‘Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.

As a humble Jew Jesus attributes ‘goodness’ as originating with God not himself. Now see Matthew’s version and how he has subtly corrected it to remove the embarrassment of Jesus’ denial that he is ‘good’,

Then someone came to him and said, ‘Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?’ And he said to him, ‘Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. Matthew 19:17

‘Why do you call me good?’ has been changed to ‘Why do you ask me about what is good?’ a subtle change that completely alters the meaning of the question. Matthew may have removed an embarrassing saying of Jesus but has unintentionally created another problem: the Messiah is asked what good deed must he do to have eternal life, but oddly the Messiah (the Anointed of God) who should know a thing or two about good deeds leading to life rebukes the man! But if God’s Anointed knows nothing of good deeds what hope for the rest of us! This problem did not arise in Mark’s earlier account.

7) Mark portrays Jesus despairing of God’s help at the crucifixion as he cries: ‘My God my God why have you abandoned me?’ (15:34) – Luke and John both omit this in their gospels.

So it seems clear that in the earliest gospel Jesus does not exhibit any of the attributes of God that Jews, Christians and Muslims commonly accept: unlike God, Jesus is not all knowing; he is not omnipotent; he is not perfectly good; he is not eternal; he is not immortal; he is not unchanging. Therefore it seems obvious that he cannot be God.

As we have seen, comparing incidents from Mark with Matthew’s later version of these same stories one can see that he has removed Jesus’ potentially embarrassing statements (at least from a later Christian point of view).

As a mental experiment let us assume that Matthew had a copy of Mark in front of him. What Matthew does is to make Mark fit his understanding of Jesus. In each case Matthew introduces significant changes to Mark’s account with the result that Matthew has a somewhat higher christology (i.e. a higher doctrine of Jesus’ nature) than Mark. Matthew has quietly changed statements where Mark implied or said that Jesus was weak or ignorant.

Though Muslims and pious Christians would find it deeply perplexing, Jesus is portrayed in the gospels as uttering offensive racist comments to a non-Jew. Matthew 15:21-26 tells us:

‘Jesus left that place and went away to the district of Tyre and Sidon.Just then a Canaanite woman from that region came out and started shouting, ‘Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is tormented by a demon.’ But he did not answer her at all. And his disciples came and urged him, saying, ‘Send her away, for she keeps shouting after us.’ He answered, ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’ But she came and knelt before him, saying, ‘Lord, help me.’ He answered, ‘It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.’ She said, ‘Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table.’

When Jesus is portrayed as calling the gentile woman a “dog” he was using a standard derogatory term for non-Jews.

However the truth of Jesus’ claim: ‘I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel’ is confirmed by the Quranic revelation:

And when Jesus, the son of Mary, said: “O children of Israel! Behold, I am an apostle of God unto you, sent to confirm the truth of whatever there still remains of the Torah” 61:6

The central affirmation of Islam is that Jesus was a prophet of God and a Messiah of Israel. Is there any evidence in the earliest gospels of Jesus identifying with these roles?

There are at least two occasions in which Jesus is portrayed as describing himself as a prophet. One was the time when Jesus visited his home town of Nazareth where he was not accepted as a prophet because he was seen as just an ordinary person, a carpenter whose family still lived there.

Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honour except in his own town, among his relatives and in his own home.” Mark 6:4. See also Luke 13:33.

Finally, according to Matthew’s narrative of Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem, a very large crowd spread their cloaks on the road, while others cut branches from the trees and spread them on the road. The crowds that went ahead of him and those that followed shouted,

“Hosanna to the Son of David!”

“Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!”

“Hosanna in the highest!”

When Jesus entered Jerusalem, the whole city was stirred and asked, “Who is this?” The crowds answered, “This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth in Galilee.” 



Categories: Bible, Christianity, Christology, New Testament scholarship

18 replies

  1. In the Gospel of Mark we also see that the Lord Jesus is God in that:
    1. He is the proper recipient of worship (Mark 5:6).
    2. He cites the main part of the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4-5) in Mark 12:29-30 in which the only one YHWH is to be the proper recipient of worship and yet Mark also teaches that the Lord Jesus is properly worshiped (see 1 and 3).
    3. He applies what was spoken of by Daniel unto Himself (Mark 14:62). This is very significant because in Daniel 7:14 He is the proper recipient of pelach – worship that is due unto God alone.

    • Your entire argument is based on the idea that according to the New Testament, only God should be the recipient of worship.

      In other words, it is of the type:
      1. Only God can X.
      2. Jesus can X.
      3. Therefore, Jesus = God.

      But the argument is fallacious and wrong.

      • Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?

        And the scribes and the Pharisees began to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies? Who can forgive sins, but God alone?

        But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power upon earth to forgive sins, (he said unto the sick of the palsy,) I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy couch, and go into thine house.

  2. An assertion without proof.

  3. And they came to him, and awoke him, saying, Master, master, we perish. Then he arose, and rebuked the wind and the raging of the water: and they ceased, and there was a calm.

    • “But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power upon earth to forgive sins”

      Exactly Watson.

      1. According to Mark, Jesus, the son of man, has been given authority from the Father, i.e. the one true God, to forgive sins.
      2. Therefore it’s a wrong premise to claim that only the Father/God can forgive sins. Jesus can also forgive sins, by the authority of the Father/God.
      3. Since it’s wrong by the New Testament to claim that only God can forgive sins, then by extension, to say that [[only God can >forgive sins<, Jesus forgives sins, therefore Jesus is God]] is *also WRONG*.
      4. In conclusion, according to the NT, Jesus forgiving sins doesn't mean that he is god, it simply means he has obtained the authority to do so by God. Like a messenger. A prophet. Like Elisha. [http://www.gobible.org/study/140.php]

      ""All things have been handed over to Me by My Father…" [Matthew 11:27]

      • Worship is a whole different ball game, because the Bible teaches that only God is to be worshiped. It is part of the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:5) and is repeated elsewhere in both the Old Testament (1 Samuel 7:3) and the New Testament (Matthew 4:10; Luke 4:8). As with Revelation 15:4 we see the “aloneness” of God encompasses the Lord Jesus.

  4. “Worship is a whole different ball game, because the Bible teaches that only God is to be worshiped.
    It is part of the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:5) and is repeated elsewhere in both the Old Testament (1 Samuel 7:3)”

    – The Old Testament yes. The New Testament, not so much.
    This is not the only thing. The New Testament abrogates lots of things that the OT contains.

    “and the New Testament (Matthew 4:10; Luke 4:8). As with Revelation 15:4 we see the “aloneness” of God encompasses the Lord Jesus.”

    – You see the reasons for the worship of Jesus in Revelation 5. And it is clear from the passage that people aren’t worshipping Jesus because he has the same ousia/essence as the Father. In other words, they aren’t worshipping Jesus because he is god. In fact, they are worshipping Jesus because:

    1.1. “𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘣𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘎𝘰𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘎𝘰𝘥, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩.”

    1.2. “𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘮𝘣, 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘯, 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘥𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘦!”

    1.3. “𝘛𝘰 𝘩𝘪𝘮 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘓𝘢𝘮𝘣 𝘣𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳, 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳!”

    It is very easy to understand, once you’re not making things up.

  5. They are worshiping the Lord Jesus in Revelation 5 because He is God – only God is to be worshiped (Revelation 15:4).
    Not surprisingly Christ is worshiped because of His attribute of “power” (Revelation 5:12), because just like the Father (cf. Revelation 4:11) it is an attribute they each possess. If Christ was not the Almighty then He would not be worshiped for possessing this attribute.

    TDNT: In 5:12f. the angelic choirs extol the omnipotence of the Lamb in a seven-membered doxology (8:178, timē, J. Schneider).

    • 1. Revelation 4 teaches us that God is to be worshipped because (1) He is the Creator of all things and also (2) He is the ground of all being.
      2. Revelation 5 teaches us that Jesus is to be worshipped because he exemplifies the perfect instance of a man submitting to God, because of his atonement, and because of the him conveying God’s message to all people. This is why God exalted him, and this is how he “received power”.

      Stop confusing the two points

  6. 1. In Revelation 4 one of the reasons God is worshiped is because of His attribute of “power” – He is the Almighty.
    2. In Revelation 5 one of the reasons Jesus is worshiped is because of His attribute of “power” – He is the Almighty.

    People can receive power but they are never to be worshiped. Only the All Powerful (= God) should be worshiped.
    Stop teaching idolatry.

    • Except that,

      1. In Revelation 4 God is worshipped as Almighty, but most importantly, He is described as such. (verse 8, to be precise)
      2. In Revelation 5 Jesus is worshipped because of his power, YES, but (1) the power is 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫, and (2) and by no means is Jesus described as Almighty in the text. You’re projecting your own bias onto it. Which means, Jesus being Almighty is (1) not only not supported by the text, (2) it is firmly rejected because to have 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫, means to NOT be Almighty.

      “People can receive power but they are never to be worshiped. Only the All Powerful (= God) should be worshiped.
      Stop teaching idolatry.”
      – I agree and that’s why I reject Bible altogether. I’m a firm monotheist and worship the only One.

      • You wrote: In Revelation 5 Jesus is worshipped because of his power, YES, but (1) the power is 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫,

        He wouldn’t be worshiped unless He had all power ( = Almighty), for they would not have committed idolatry.

        This web site does not have people who can respond in a meaningful way. It’s a mess.

        I’m leaving.

        – bye-

    • ” In Revelation 5 one of the reasons Jesus is worshiped is because of His attribute of “power” – He is the Almighty.

      People can receive power but they are never to be worshiped. ”

      Everything that the Father gives me will come to me, and anyone who comes to me I will never drive away

      so you are a pagan polytheist?

  7. @Marc Taylor

    “You wrote: In Revelation 5 Jesus is worshipped because of his power, YES, but (1) the power is 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫,”
    > Indeed.
    “He wouldn’t be worshiped unless He had all power ( = Almighty), for they would not have committed idolatry.”
    > That’s your assumption. The NT does not say that. The OT does. But the NT and OT don’t agree totally, otherwise you’d know by now that the Messiah according to the OT is a mere human being, not fully divine and fully man.
    “This web site does not have people who can respond in a meaningful way. It’s a mess. I’m leaving.”
    > I think I’m very concise, to be honest. You disagree, that’s your problem. It’s okay. May God guide us all. Bye.

  8. Marc,
    “You wrote: In Revelation 5 Jesus is worshipped because of his power, YES, but (1) the power is 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫,”
    > Indeed.
    “He wouldn’t be worshiped unless He had all power ( = Almighty), for they would not have committed idolatry.”
    > Your assumption. The NT doesn’t say that. The OT does say it, but the OT also says that the Messiah is a mere human being. You (and your interpretation of the NT) obviously don’t agree with the latter.
    “This web site does not have people who can respond in a meaningful way. It’s a mess.”
    > I disagree. I think I’m very concise in my replies. It’s okay though. Have a good day. May God guide us all.

  9. are you the same marc taylor ?

    https://www.postost.net/2019/01/does-daniel-say-nations-will-worship-one-son-man

    you can’t even leave the book of daniel. you need to read your polytheism in daniel , why?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: