Al-Isra and the “Temple” in the Islamic Sources: Response to Sam Shamoun, Part III-B

Al-Isra and the “Temple” in the Islamic Sources: Response to Sam Shamoun, Part III-B

Originally posted on the Quran and Bible Blog

بِسْمِ اللهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْم

“Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from al-Masjid al-Haram to al-Masjid al-Aqsa, whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing.”

– The Quran, Surah Al-Isra, 17:1[1]

            This article is a continuation of my three-part refutation of Sam Shamoun’s latest train-wreck. Here, I will respond to “Part 2” of Shamoun’s rebuttal. As we will see, Shamoun has a weird hang-up on the meaning of the word “mosque” (this will be seen in Part III-C as well). He is so convinced of his own idiotic opinion, that he will even try to twist the scholarly sources to say what he wants them to say, and even try to revise established history just to glorify his ego. However, Shamoun’s shoddy and deceptive tactics will be refuted, inshaAllah.

Sam Shamoun – The Fraud, Act 2

            Shamoun begins this train-wreck in “Part 2” by appealing to some more ahadith which he thinks support his argument, but which actually further demonstrate his incompetence and ignorance of classical Islamic sources. Moreover, this is just a repetition of the same argument that I have already thoroughly refuted. When the ahadith refer to the “Mosque of Aqsa” or the “Mosque of Aelia”, or when they state that the Prophet prayed “in” the mosque, they are referring to the entire compound. Shamoun has yet to refute this, and yet he has convinced himself of his own delusion, which is why he says that:

“[s]eeing that the Kabah and Muhammad’s mosque are clearly physical buildings, this means that bait al-mqadis [sic] must be a physical building as well. There’s simply no way around this.”

It is truly amazing to see how deluded Shamoun really is. He really expects us to accept his flawed logic based on a non-sequitur. We have already established that Al-Masjid Al-Haram and Al-Masjid An-Nabawi were both built as open-air mosques. The dome that currently sits on top of the latter was only added later. In its original form, Al-Masjid An-Nabawi was just like Al-Masjid Al-Haram. Not only that, but the Kaaba (which is part of Al-Masjid Al-Haram) itself is part physical-building (the cube-shaped building) and part open-space (Al-Hatim). Finally, even if these were physical buildings complete with doors, windows, etc.,[2] that does not mean that Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa must also necessarily be a similar building. Shamoun just cannot get it through his head that this is just flawed logic on his part. As I explained in Part II, if I went on vacation and said that “I left my house in the morning and traveled to Tokyo”, no one in their right mind would assume that Tokyo must also be a house. Rather, it would be understood that it is a city.

            The extent of Shamoun’s delusion is so great that he even proposes the ridiculous and far-fetched theory that Surah 17 was “composed after the caliph Abd al-Malik bin Marwan”! He also states:

“[a]fter all, what better way to justify the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem than to claim that their prophet had been taken there as a sign that Allah had given him and his followers the right to it seeing that he is the seal of all the biblical prophets, and therefore the rightful heir to this holy place?”

But does Shamoun present any scholarly evidence to support this, other than his own idiotic non-sequitur and misunderstanding of the Islamic sources? Of course not. This is all in Shamoun’s incompetent mind. Indeed, the evidence is once again in opposition to Shamoun and his delusions.

            First of all, the fact is that there was no need to “justify the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem” by making up a verse about it which doesn’t even mention Jerusalem by name. If the motive was to establish a link between Islam and Jerusalem, then one would assume that the verse would have been forged so as to leave no doubt that it was referring to Jerusalem. Nevertheless, as we have seen, the verse was indeed clearly referring to the Holy Land (see Part III-A). The point is that if the motivation was to place a Muslim claim over Jerusalem by forging the verse, then it follows that the verse would have plainly mentioned Jerusalem  by name, which is not the case.

            The other reason why there was no need to justify a Muslim claim over Jerusalem by forging this verse is that there is no doubt that Muslims prayed in the direction of Jerusalem from the beginning, until the qibla (direction of prayer) was changed to Mecca. On this point, there is no disagreement, whether among Muslim scholars or non-Muslim scholars. No one denies that the first qibla was towards Jerusalem. Shamoun would be very hard-pressed to refute this. Indeed, it would be very unlikely, and down-right impossible, that all the qibla verses would also have been forged after Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan!  

            Second, we can point to the paleographical evidence to refute Shamoun’s absurd theory. A manuscript of the Quran, Codex Sana’a I, has been dated to the mid-first century AH (after hijra), and specifically to within 15 years after the Prophet Muhammad’s death.[3] As explained by “Islamic-Awareness”, scholars have thoroughly analyzed this codex and concluded that:

“…the scriptio inferior text belonged to the period of the companions of Prophet Muhammad, whilst the scriptio superior text belonged to the ʿUthmānic tradition, and using stemmatics, the ʿUthmānic tradition was shown to give the most accurate reproduction of the Prophetic prototype.”[4]

Moreover, the scriptio superior text is thought to have been written:

“…by the first or second half of the 7th century or even the early 8th century (more generally the 1st century hijra).”[5]

So there is a good chance that it was written before the reign of Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan (i.e., before 685 CE), though it is also possible (but unlikely) that it was written afterwards as well. Now, what does this have to with the present topic? Well, the codex contains more than 40% of the Quran, including Surah 17:1 (folio 6B).

            But wait, there is more. There is an even better example of paleographical evidence that completely refutes Shamoun’s theory. Codex B. L. Or. 2165 has been dated to the “second half of the 1st century of hijra”, and folio 39r contains the verse from Surah 17.[6] Furthermore, Yasin Dutton, an international authority on Quranic manuscripts, has suggested that the codex can be dated to before the reign of al-Walid  ibn Abd al-Malik(r. 705-715 CE),[7] the son of and successor to Abd al-Malik. In other words, we have good evidence that this codex was written before the time period that Shamoun is suggesting when Surah 17:1 was allegedly forged to manufacture an Islamic claim to Jerusalem! Thus, the paleographic evidence discounts Shamoun’s pathetic theory.


Figure 1 – Codex B.L. Or. 2165, Folio 39r contains Surah 17:1 and has been dated by Yasin Dutton to before the year 705 CE (Source:

            But wait, there’s more! Codex Arabe 331 is another manuscript of the Quran which contains Surah 17:1 (folio 48v), and it has been dated with 89.3% probability to between 652–­­694 CE, thus placing it before the end of Abd al-Malik’s reign.[8] In contrast, there is only a 6.1% probability that it was written between 747­­­­­­­­–763 CE.

            More evidence of the Islamic connection to Jerusalem and the Holy Land comes from an anonymous Christian chronicler, previously thought to be a bishop named Sebeos.[9] This chronicler is thought to have written his account in the 660s, almost 20 years before the beginning of Abd al-Malik’s reign.[10] According to him, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) himself had stated that the Holy Land had been given to Abraham (peace be upon him), which is also stated in the the Quran (see Part III-A), and that as the “posterity” of Abraham, the Muslims were to “go and take possession” of that land.[11] It seems unlikely that a Christian would have made up such a claim unless he had heard of the Islamic connection to the Holy Land and Jerusalem in some form.

            Finally, Uri Rubin explains that the Quran’s reference to Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa and Jerusalem “corresponds to the evidence of the vocabulary of the Qur’an itself…”[12] More importantly, Rubin states that this link (emphasis mine):

“…can be considered pre-Umayyad.”[13]

            Also, according to Professor Beatrice St. Laurent (Bridgewater State University), there is evidence that the governor of Syria, Muawiya (may Allah be pleased with him), had built a mosque on the Haram Al-Sharif compound between 638 and 660 CE (this mosque was known as Solomon’s Stables but is now known as the Marwani Musalla).[14] Not only that, but St. Laurent also proposes that it was Muawiya who initiated the construction of the Dome of the Rock, and not Abd Al-Malik Ibn Marwan. Rather, the latter continued the project where the former had left off, and completed the Dome of the Rock in 692 CE.[15] This is an interesting observation, as it would prove that a companion of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), Muawiya, had placed great importance on the entire sanctuary. This is why he would have initiated 2 building projects, one for the Marwani Musalla and one for the Dome of the Rock, the latter being the location from which Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) ascended to Heaven during the Night Journey. This also proves once again that the entire compound was considered a sacred area, and thus a “mosque”, with smaller mosques built within it.

Beatrice St. Laurent - Temple Mount With Muawiya Mosque

Figure 2 – Aerial view of the Haram Al-Sharif (Temple Mount) compound. The green areas represent the location of the Marwani Musalla, built by Muawiya in the 600s CE. Source:

So once again, Shamoun finds himself on the wrong side of history and the evidence. This concludes Part III-B of my response.

[1] This is from the Saheeh International translation.

[2] As we have already established, the “doors” of Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa mentioned in the ahadith simply refer to the gates of the Temple Mount compound. See Part I for a discussion.


[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.




[9] According to Robert Hoyland, the anonymous chronicle does not match “the three surviving excerpts from Sebeos’ composition”, and “so the two must be considered distinct documents, the one by Sebeos having been lost bar the excerpts” (Seeing Islam As Others Saw It: A Survey And Evaluation Of Christian, Jewish And Zoroastrian Writings On Early Islam [Princeton, New Jersey: The Darwin Press, Inc., 1997], p. 124,

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid., p. 129.

[12] Uri Rubin, “Muhammad’s Night Journey (isra’) to al-Masjid al-Aqsa: Aspects of the Earliest Origins of the Islamic Sanctity of Jerusalem,” al-Qantara 29 (2008): 164,

[13] Ibid.

[14] Beatrice St. Laurent, “Discovering Jerusalem’s First Mosque on theHaram al-Sharif and Capitalizing Jerusalem in theSeventh Century,” Bridgewater Review, 36, no. 1 (May 2017): 23,

[15] Ibid., p. 26.

Categories: Hadith, History, Islam, Jerusalem, Muhammad, Palestine, Qur'an, Sam Shamoun

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

49 replies

  1. This is probably the worst humiliation Shamoun has experienced since his divorce.

    • Humiliate me? Divorce? You must be talking of you filthy profit whom we keep humiliating time and time again.

      Now that you produced your “rebuttal,” this means you are ready to debate me on Q. 17:1. Email me or so we can arrange it. If you don’t, I am going to call you out publicly for avoiding to come to the defense of your filthy vile profit and the satan that possessed. him. You can even have this other lowlife dog Kmart come and assist you in trying to save your filthy profit.


      • 😂🤣 Why am I not surprised? Sam “The Scam” Shamoun is begging a debate! What do you think we have been doing all this time, dummy? This is a debate.

        As I have already told you, you attention-starved clown, I do written correspondences only. And so far, you have been exposed as the fraud you are. So stop crying and begging for a debate, Gentile dog. Say what you have to say in your so-called “rebuttals”.

        By the way, there is one more part coming that will finish you off on this topic, inshaAllah. Stay tuned…

      • You still barking? Wait what I’m going to unleash on you next since you were stupid enough to raise the issue of the manuscripts to defend your position. Like I said anytime you start barking I will xxx xxxxxxxxx. Now in the meantime Faisal man up and let’s get this debate underway.

      • 😂🤣 The Gentile dog is still foaming at the mouth!

      • O boy! Your tities must be hurting right about now. How does it feel fatty? To be so BADLY humiliated and there is nothing you can do about it. You try and try to lure us into the trap of doing a verbal debate so that you can apply your pathetic machingun tactic and hide behind the comments of the buttlickers that are the pagan crosstians that folow you and your vaginagod but are NEVER able to get away with it in written articles. Calm down fatty, calm down. Here read some porn form your pornbook:

        Song of Songs 8:1-3
        “If only you were to me like a brother, who was nursed at my mother’s breasts! Then, if I found you outside, I would kiss you, and no one would despise me. I would lead you and bring you to my mother’s house– she who has taught me. I would give you spiced wine to drink [i.e., her vagina’s wet!], the nectar of my pomegranates. His left arm is under my head and his right arm embraces me.”

        Song of Songs 4:5
        “Your two breasts are like two fawns, like twin fawns of a gazelle that browse among the lilies.”

        Song of Songs 1:13
        “My lover is to me a sachet of myrrh resting between my breasts.”

        Ezekiel 23:20
        There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

      • Shamoun:Humiliate me? Divorce? You must be talking of you filthy profit whom we keep humiliating time and time again.

        Nope. I’m talking about you.

      • Shamoun: You still barking? Wait what I’m going to unleash on you next since you were stupid enough to raise the issue of the manuscripts to defend your position.

        What are you going to do? Bring up Brubaker’s book that has made 0 impact on the scholarship on Quranic manuscripts? It wasn’t even published by any academic presses!

      • Oooh, the suspense is killing me! I’m sooo scared!

      • I’m just wondering why muslims have to read Sam’s comments which by most are just insulting for the prophetﷺ and muslims?
        No only are his comments kept, but also he is given a space to write!? For God sake, what kind of policy is this?
        This man should be blocked instantly with no mercy! This kind of christians is not interested in having debates with muslims. Just get him back to his pigsty where he actually belongs to.

      • That means we need to block your profit and your god for their filth.

      • No, it means we could block you and your rabbit turds. 😉

      • It means we muzzle your rabid profit fir confirming the Torah which mentions rabbits chewing cud as God’s word, which means he was full of rabbit manure and an illiterate pedophile according to you. So thank you for helping us further humiliate your demon possessed profit. 😂

      • 😂😂😂 The Scam sounds mad! Don’t get mad Scam. It’s not our fault that your god couldn’t get simple biology right. And that’s just one of the many things about the world that your god did not know.

      • Yiu again for me confused with your profit who was mad due to being demon possessed abs would foam at the mouth like the good lil demon he was. We will see whether the demon that possessed your profit got anything right in your book of porn once you accept my debate challenge. Like I said you got till Friday to get of your wife’s mirt before I go public with my challenge to muzzle you and you profit. In the meantime keep foaming like your pedophile profit liked to do. 😎

      • 🤣😂😂 Actually, it seems you’re the one who’s possessed. Imagine that. A fat, demon-possessed Crosstian eating rabbit turds and Yahweh’s personal brand of fecal bread! 😂

        The Scam still barking and begging for a debate, when he’s lost the debate already. Keep begging you baboon. I couldn’t care less about your pathetic “challenge”. Maybe you should challenge yourself to find a real job, eh? 😉

      • you still barking? The fact is your sources confirm your profit was possessed by a demon, which is why he would foam like a madman much like you. Speaking of fat, you keep condemning your mommy Sauda for being a fat porker whom your pedophile profit wanted to dump since he was so merciful. As far as getting a job is cocnerned, you should have told your vile profit who made a living off of raping married women, robbing caravans, and stealing people’s profits, in order to whore women in the name of pleasure marriage. Praise God that demon is now dead and burning in hell. And looking at your partner, I wouldn’t be talking about fat demons. Now time to get out of your wifey’s mirt and email to arrange your slaughter on Q. 17:1. Stop with the barking and hiding behind your comments section and blog. Man it really sucks being you, a stone smooching pagan whose profit loved to stuff himself with rabbit crap. 😉

      • 😂😂 The Scam is really angry! Man, that demon living in that fat slab you call a body must be really getting riled up! Calm down Scam. Eat some more rabbit turds and Yahweh’s fecal bread and take a nap. Then, when you’re refreshed, look for a real job and life.

      • Brother QB, leave this filthy man. Don’t waste your time with him. He’s not really worthy of your time.

      • I agree leave Muhammad and his jinn, since you don’t get more filthy than them. Anyway, you got till Friday to set up a debate with me. Lord willing, if you cower away like your profit used to do, then I will be calling you out publicly sometime next week. I am going to make you famous at the expense of your profit.

      • 😂😂 The Scam still begs! Get a life Scam, seriously.

      • Islam’s dog, it’s Saturday and you didn’t email me. God willing, sometime next week I will be issuing a public challenge for you to get out of your wife’s mirt and debate me on Q. 17:1. I will even add a further challenge to debate on the Quran’s scientific blunders since you love science so much. That way I can stuff your mouth with the same rabbit turds that your profit swallowed whole. So be ready to get muzzled.

      • Oh Scam. Why don’t you get a life and a real job? Stop eating those rabbit turds please. It’s for your own good.

      • May Allah deal with you according to His Justice.

      • inshaAllah! Ameen!

      • Shamoun: I am going to make you famous at the expense of your profit.

        You need to be an influential person yourself in order to make others famous. Do I need to remind you that no one gives a crap about your crazy a$$?

      • Shamoun; I will even add a further challenge to debate on the Quran’s scientific blunders since you love science so much.

        You didn’t even complete high school, and you want to have a debate on science?

      • And your profit was an illiterate rapist. That doesn’t stop you from following this pedophile or the devil that inspired him. But that’s all you can do, is bark like a rabid puppy. it’s too bad you stone kissers aren’t men enough to debate but can hid behind comments section, or when you and a horde of other women raping jihadis gang up on innocent victims to do what your profit did. Praise God, your profit is dead and in hell.

      • And that ladies and gentlemen is fatty shamoun in a nutshell.
        The fatty can’t refute anything so he KEEPS the ego train going by deflecting to a verbal debate since he can NEVER win a written one. Like always the fat, filthy maggot wants to hide behind its machinegun tactic since the fat blob knows it can’t get away with it in a written debate where the other person can go through each argument point by point. Hey fatty have you read some more pornverses in your pornbook? Since you’re wife has left you, you’re probably getting agitated coz no one can satisfy your perverted needs but not all is lost fatty since you can jerk yourself off with your pornbook:

        Song of Songs 8:1-3
        “If only you were to me like a brother, who was nursed at my mother’s breasts! Then, if I found you outside, I would kiss you, and no one would despise me. I would lead you and bring you to my mother’s house– she who has taught me. I would give you spiced wine to drink, the nectar of my pomegranates. His left arm is under my head and his right arm embraces me.”

        Song of Songs 4:5
        “Your two breasts are like two fawns, like twin fawns of a gazelle that browse among the lilies.”

        Song of Songs 1:13
        “My lover is to me a sachet of myrrh resting between my breasts.”

        Ezekiel 23:20
        There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

        Now excuse me while I go puke.

      • Shamoun: And your profit was an illiterate rapist.

        Oh please. You’re just jealous that an illiterate man achieved way more in 23 years, despite the odds against him, than you ever will. In contrast, all you’ve achieved in the last 23 years is greater mental instability and a divorce. How is being a jerk on the internet helping your daughters? When will you grow up you sick piece of sh it?

  2. I have offered to post Sam’s rebuttal on Blogging Theology. Its up to him..

  3. Shamoun got beat up verbally, physically he probably slapped his head a few times as well. I for one would not want to see his filthy face or hear his nonsense via video debate. The fool that he is, thinking a video debate would help him…doesn’t he realize hes already having a debate on this blog… His shameless stupid ass is insufferable.

    • Exactly! But that’s how these people operate. They want to blitz you in a verbal debate and then claim “victory”. But when one takes the time to thoroughly research and test their claims, one tends to find that they crumble. But you don’t have the time needed to do that research in a verbal debate. But that’s their deception. This is the only way they can pretend to “win”.

      • Go on Pavlov, don’t be shy. After all you and Shamoun are truly a match made in heaven. You know up there, where the winged horses fly, above the seven heavens. Were your forefather Adam the homo erectus comes from. Sent “down” hi hi.

      • Hey doorknob! What happened, moron? No response to the science, eh? Your nose must be really big. You keep sticking it in places it doesn’t belong! 😂

        So you’ve been reduced to lurking in the shadows, occasionally coming out with a comment that only makes you appear more of the moron you are.

        So what’s up with those Neanderthals?

  4. @ QB

    Yep the ol tried and true “Machine Gun Tactic”(or “Gisp Gallop” for our cousins across the pond). What the heck is “verbal debate” going to do? What’s he want you to do read the article out loud for the audience? The argument’s not going to change whether its said, printed in a newspaper or written in braille. Deal with your opponent’s rebuttal or hold the L.

  5. @ QB

    Awwww low blow.

  6. In my humble opinion, most people would show even alittle glimmer of humility in there own way when proven wrong. I don’t get that feeling at all from shamoun, his spiritual growth is at a complete standstill. He tries to defile every article post in a condescending manner and obtuse about facts, as if facts don’t register in his brain.

  7. @ QB

    Shamoun is attempting to insult Muhammad’s(saw) revelations but if my memory recalls doesn’t the Bible say a prophet liked to strip naked? (Those logs in the eyes boy are a doozy)

    I think Shamoun is confused and thinks by putting a “deadline” on his attempt to Gisp gallop it will somehow change the answer. So I would recommend you save him some time and let him know he can go ahead and post and don’t forget the links to your articles. But what do I know…

  8. @ Shamoun

    And your profit was an illiterate rapist.

    To begin dumb@$$ your books says Peter and John (one of the “writers” of your gospels) were idiots and illiterate:
    When they saw the courage of Peter and John and realized that they were unschooled, ordinary men, they were astonished and they took note that these men had been with Jesus. (Acts 4:13)

    Also, guess what MAJORITY of people in Palestine at the time were.

    Next, I think you’re confusing with the Daddy’s hordes that swept across the Middle East raping everything let me just copy from a post I made at a fellow missionary:

    1. Jesus=God in your paganism (aka the Trinity)

    2. God (aka Jesus) orders Moses to kill the Midianites:

    And the LORD said to Moses, “Take vengeance on the Midianites for the Israelites. After that, you will be gathered to your people.” So Moses told the people, “Arm some of your men for war, that they may go against the Midianites and execute the LORD’s vengeance on them… (Numbers 31:1-3)

    3. They then win the battle, kill all the men, plunder their homes and take the women and children as captives:

    Then they waged war against Midian, as the LORD had commanded Moses, and they KILLED EVERY MALE. (Numbers 31:7)

    The Israelites captured the Midianite WOMEN and their CHILDREN, and they PLUNDERED all their herds, flocks, and goods. Then they BURNED all the cities where the Midianites had lived, as well as all their encampments, and carried away all the plunder and spoils, both PEOPLE and animals. They brought the CAPTIVES, spoils, and plunder to Moses, to Eleazar the priest, and to the congregation of Israel… (Numbers 31:9-12)

    4. The Biblical Moses says that this won’t appease the bloodthirsty “Daddy” and orders the little boys and the women who are not virgins killed while the little girls are given to the Israelites to be “devoured”:

    But Moses was ANGRY with the officers of the army—the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds—who were returning from the battle. 15“Have you SPARED ALL THE WOMEN?” he asked them… (Numbers 31:14)

    Now comes the important part retard:

    So now, kill all the BOYS, and kill every woman who has had relations with a man, 18but SPARE FOR YOURSELVES EVERY GIRL who has never had relations with a man. (Numbers 31:17-18)

    Let’s now keep reading the chapter and find out what happened next.

    5. The spoils and the 32,000 LITTLE GIRLS are ORDERED by Daddy (aka Jesus) to be divided up and given as sex slaves to the fighters (the rest is divided up into sacrifices for the Cult while the priest and Moses pocket the gold):

    The LORD said to Moses, “You and Eleazar the priest and the family heads of the congregation are to take a count of what was captured, both of man and beast. Then divide the captives between the troops who went out to battle and the rest of the congregation. (Numbers 31:25-27)

    So Moses and Eleazar the priest did as the LORD had COMMANDED Moses, and this plunder remained from the spoils the soldiers had taken:
    675,000 sheep, 3372,000 cattle, 3461,000 donkeys, and 32,000 women who had not slept with a man. (Numbers 31:31-35)

    So Moses and Eleazar the priest received from them all the articles made of gold. (Number 31:51)

    6. The little virgin girls were then raped
    Now how do we know this retard? Because the Bible tells us so! Let’s break down the verse together in the next book:

    “When the Lord your God gives you victory in battle and you take prisoners… (Deuteronomy 21:11)

    Now they just fought a battle right? They killed all the women, right? There are only the little girls left as prisoners.

    “you may see among them a beautiful woman that you like and want to marry. 12 TAKE HER to your home, where she will shave her head, cut her fingernails, 13 and change her clothes. She is to stay in your home and MOURN HER PARENTS FOR A MONTH; after that, you may marry her.

    Key part why is she mourning her parents? Oh yeah because they are children.

    14 Later, if you no longer want her, you are to let her go free. Since YOU FORCED HER TO HAVE INTERCOURSE WITH YOU, you cannot treat her as a slave and sell her.” (Deuteronomy 21:14)

    In other words, after you got what you wanted from her free here because you raped her. She can’t be made a slave like the rest and be sold… 🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤮

    7. Jesus then agrees with it and encourages you to do it:

    Now let’s look at what Jesus has to say about Moses’s law that we just read:

    Do not think that I have come to ABOLISH the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to abolish them, but to FULFILL them. For I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. So then, whoever BREAKS ONE of the least of these commandments and TEACHES OTHERS TO DO LIKEWISE will be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever PRACTICES AND TEACHES will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. (Matt 5:17-19)

    I keep trying to tell you about those logs in the eyes. Also final note, the only demon-possessed person in Hell is Paul let’s read from his “gems”:

    5I will boast about such a man, but I will not boast about myself, except in my weaknesses. 6Even if I wanted to boast, I would not be a fool, because I would be speaking the truth. But I refrain, so no one will credit me with more than he sees in me or hears from me, 7or even with these surpassingly GREAT REVELATIONS.

    So to keep me from becoming conceited, I was given a thorn in my flesh, A MESSENGER OF SATAN, to torment me. 8Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me. 9But He said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for My power is perfected in weakness…” (2 Corinthians 12:5-9)

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: